Dear Friends,
1. I am sorry to hear of your negative experiences with the new board and suspect that there will be many similar stories in the days to come.
2. There will be a learning curve for board members and may also be some individuals who view themselves as gatekeepers. Either way, I still see it as being in the beta test mode as it is a relatively new entity.
3. While the various BCMRs and the BCNR are trying to push as many cases as possible over to the new board, I think that Air Force and Navy/Marine Corps members should think twice about taking such action.
4. This is because, over the past twenty years, I have found the USAF BCMR and the Navy BCNR to be the most liberal on retroactive retirement issues for persons whose cases fall within the three-year limitations period.
5. Conversely, the Army and the Coast Guard Boards are far less generous.
6. Then again, Jason rasies a good point in that many members of this community have been forced due to financial pressures to file pro se and are representing themselves.
7. Thus, you goal should be to ensure that your petition is as thorough as possible- ie. so that "if A equals B and B equals C, then A must equal C"
8. Keep us posted re any new results, as it will be vital for the community as a whole to learn of procedural and substantive issues as they develop.
v/r
Jack Gately