Jason Perry
Founder and Leader
Site Founder
Staff Member
PEB Forum Veteran
Lifetime Supporter
Registered Member
This is not right. What you may be referring to is that the CRDP calculation puts a restoration cap of 2.5% times years of service times retired base pay....I do believe that you are getting what you are saying you are getting. Just that it is not the case that length of service caps your disability retirement pay. Hard to tell what may have happened in your case.Now the Crazy of it all "for Me" goes back to Mike's post 26 July 12, He was right and I was WRONG. Money is the same. I thought I would get the 75%,,,,,,,,, WRONG!!!!I do not. I can not get more the my 65% longevity retirement. Yes I will get CRDP. The single biggest benefit is the IDES and the speedy VA rating. Not sure how anyone would ever get the 75% for "disability." By law, one can not get more $ than he/she would have receive for longevity from the military.
Fine, I did that - Four of my unfit-for-duty conditions meet the criteria to overcome the presumption rule - and I sent in my appeal rebuttal. This time, they moved the goal posts and said that, because I'm a Retiree Recall, there is no period of presumption and my rebuttal was denied based on that - the regulations are silent on whether or not the preiod of presumption restarts when a retiree recall comes on active duty and the PEB took the conservative position that I don't have a period of presumption.
My formal board is scheduled for 12 April and I'm looking for any help on if anyone has found something that helps clarify whther or not a retiree recall's perid of presumption restarts or not?
There is a very technical legal question here about what deference do agencies get in interpreting their own regulations. The standard rule is that they get a lot of deference. The famous administrative law case is called Chenery. However, there is an exception to the Chenery deference- that is when multiple agencies are interpreting the same regulation (which you find often in military disability issues- because each branch of service has its own implementing regulations). The case that lays out the exception is called Auer.
What caught my eye about your post, though, is that it seems that you are focused on the presumptive period. Recall, even if PFIT applies, it can be overcome. So, you have an additional argument that you can make.