My timeline round 3

U

Usndocgreen

Well-Known Member
PEB Forum Veteran
Registered Member
Hello All,
I am posting my timeline thus far to hopefully contribute something to this community. I have had 5 MEB's and from those 3 PEB's have been generated. I am in that 3rd PEB Now. My issues are Cervical and Lumbar spine, shoulder, tmj, Depression and Fibro. 15 Surgeries in total and last full PRT in 2014. I have looked at this forum so many times over the last years as my conditions have chronically gotten worse. Posting now here as my third go round through this whole process. New this time around are the depression and fibromyalgia diagnoses.

PEB #1 Nov 2009 Fit to Continue on Active Duty
PEB #2 JUN 2018 Fit But non deployable

PEB #3 Timeline
Referral for MEB: September 4, 2019
Contacted by PEBLO: September 5, 2019
Met with VA to schedule C&P exams: September 11, 2019
First C&P exam: September 23, 2019
NMA Stamped received: OCT 07 2019
Last C&P exam: October 24, 2019
NARSUM (1st signature): November 18, 2019
NARSUM (final signature):November 21, 2019
PEBLO Meeting for review: November 22, 2019
Package with PEB Presiding officer: December 10,2019

Waiting....... Spoke with Gunny and Package still with Presiding officer
 
I'm guessing you pretty much has the process down pat. What outcome do you desire? Best wishes and happy holidays. Mike
 
Update today I spoke with the peb office and my package is with QA at the PEB. Does anyone know if this happens for both fit and unfit packages or just unfit? They told me I would hear from my PEBLO after it leaves QA
 
Quality assurance goes both ways. The PEB is responsible to get the both the FIT and UNFIT decisions correct. Hope you hear an answer soon. I went through two MEBs, five RILOs, but only one PEB. I can't begin to imagine what you have been through.
 
chaplaincharlie said:
Quality assurance goes both ways. The PEB is responsible to get the both the FIT and UNFIT decisions correct. Hope you hear an answer soon. I went through two MEBs, five RILOs, but only one PEB. I can't begin to imagine what you have been through.
Click to expand...

thank you!! Yes it’s been crazy! Last time my request for a FOrmal peb was declined. If I am found fit again despite all these recommendations by docs and command is there another route? Can an attorney do anything?
 
Your service should provide an attorney, on your request. I Suggest you ask for one. Eventually, someone WILL challenge the USN, because the DoDI says the services should implement consistent processes. The USN is inconsistent with its peers. Medics have it worse than others.
 
There is the attorney I worked with in the ides office. Are talking about that person or actually going to the local legal support office and speaking with a JAG? They only give advice they don’t actually work on your behalf it’s rediculous
 
Update...



PEB #1 Nov 2009 Fit to Continue on Active Duty
PEB #2 JUN 2018 Fit But non deployable

PEB #3 Timeline
Referral for MEB: September 4, 2019
Contacted by PEBLO: September 5, 2019
Met with VA to schedule C&P exams: September 11, 2019
First C&P exam: September 23, 2019
NMA Stamped received: OCT 07 2019
Last C&P exam: October 24, 2019
NARSUM (1st signature): November 18, 2019
NARSUM (final signature):November 21, 2019
PEBLO Meeting for review: November 22, 2019
Package with PEB Presiding officer: December 10,2019

23 Dec 2019 Peb office reported its with QA
30 Dec 2019 PEBLO reports package is still with PEB
 
Update here


PEB #1 Nov 2009 Fit to Continue on Active Duty
PEB #2 JUN 2018 Fit But non deployable

PEB #3 Timeline
Referral for MEB: September 4, 2019
Contacted by PEBLO: September 5, 2019
Met with VA to schedule C&P exams: September 11, 2019
First C&P exam: September 23, 2019
NMA Stamped received: OCT 07 2019
Last C&P exam: October 24, 2019
NARSUM (1st signature): November 18, 2019
NARSUM (final signature):November 21, 2019
PEBLO Meeting for review: November 22, 2019
Package with PEB Presiding officer: December 10,2019

23 Dec 2019 Peb office reported its with QA
30 Dec 2019 PEBLO reports package is still with PEB
9Jan 2020 peb office says still in QA
13 Jan 2020 findings back fit

Planning to request fpeb but my request was denied last time. I find this amazing with 10 referred conditions and rec to separate from command
 
chaplaincharlie said:
Your service should provide an attorney, on your request. I Suggest you ask for one. Eventually, someone WILL challenge the USN, because the DoDI says the services should implement consistent processes. The USN is inconsistent with its peers. Medics have it worse than others.
Click to expand...

I have called and emailed Jason Perry several times. Any other way to get in touch?
 
He travels and pursues cases. It may take a week or two for him to reply. @Jason Perry
 
Outstanding
 
Update...


PEB #1 Nov 2009 Fit to Continue on Active Duty
PEB #2 JUN 2018 Fit But non deployable

PEB #3 Timeline
Referral for MEB: September 4, 2019
Contacted by PEBLO: September 5, 2019
Met with VA to schedule C&P exams: September 11, 2019
First C&P exam: September 23, 2019
NMA Stamped received: OCT 07 2019
Last C&P exam: October 24, 2019
NARSUM (1st signature): November 18, 2019
NARSUM (final signature):November 21, 2019
PEBLO Meeting for review: November 22, 2019
Package with PEB Presiding officer: December 10,2019

23 Dec 2019 Peb office reported its with QA
30 Dec 2019 PEBLO reports package is still with PEB
9Jan 2020 peb office says still in QA
13 Jan 2020 findings back fit
28 Jan 2020 election of options signed requesting formal PEB . Included letters x2 and impact statement
 
I want to write so much but I think i should wait a bit.
 
Usndocgreen said:
Update...


PEB #1 Nov 2009 Fit to Continue on Active Duty
PEB #2 JUN 2018 Fit But non deployable

PEB #3 Timeline
Referral for MEB: September 4, 2019
Contacted by PEBLO: September 5, 2019
Met with VA to schedule C&P exams: September 11, 2019
First C&P exam: September 23, 2019
NMA Stamped received: OCT 07 2019
Last C&P exam: October 24, 2019
NARSUM (1st signature): November 18, 2019
NARSUM (final signature):November 21, 2019
PEBLO Meeting for review: November 22, 2019
Package with PEB Presiding officer: December 10,2019

23 Dec 2019 Peb office reported its with QA
30 Dec 2019 PEBLO reports package is still with PEB
9Jan 2020 peb office says still in QA
13 Jan 2020 findings back fit
28 Jan 2020 election of options signed requesting formal PEB . Included letters x2 and impact statement
Click to expand...

Geez, are your Commander’s statements for or against retention? That makes a huge difference. Unless you are really good at your job and perform well, it baffles my mind as to why you’re found ‘fit’ each time.
 
The comments this last time were definitely not for retention. They listed many of the issues they’ve seen as well as clearly stating No to the question in the NMA about having good potential for continued service. Yet the ipeb still said fit
 
A challenging event happened for a entrepreneur in Pennsylvania when a vendor review indicated a fraudulent history. The owner needed to work with a fresh supplier to grow their shop. The screening showed the supplier had a negative payment history. Owners depend on these checks to pick safe suppliers. The entrepreneur became worried about working with the supplier. The service pulled data from public files. Some entrepreneurs believe these companies should find scams more well. The wrong record paused the agreement for days. The entrepreneur required a correct report to proceed. Businesses stress about their partnerships being safe. The company claimed they stick to tough laws to safeguard data. A owner recommended providers look at supplier details carefully. The businessperson worked to fix the details with the vendor. Local rules change how these checks operate. Some shops currently ask improved systems for checks. Officials are considering new laws to stop errors. Experts believe providers should enhance their processes for accuracy. The businessperson wants to resolve the issue quickly. These mistakes can stop plans quickly. The service gave support to address the issue promptly. A reliable system remains key for owners. For extra insights on business checks, explore background check reviews to access helpful resources. Owners should check reports for issues. If anything seems off, they must inform the service quickly. This keeps a good method for everyone. Owners can request to check the report if required. They can fix any wrong data they spot. Saving a copy can prove beneficial later. The service provides help to address issues swiftly. Companies should teach their workers on check policies. This can avoid later problems. Businesses should know their rights regarding checks. Openness fosters assurance for everyone.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top