Diagnosed with PTSD and Major Depressive disorder. Limdu for 6 months. Two months at an inpatient treatment facility. One month in a mental hospital. Findings came back fit...How is this possible???
Findings Came Back Fit?
- Thread starter SirEnder
- Start date
It depends on your symptoms now; not your symptoms while hospitalized.
According to the findings, I cannot be broken because I had a good eval 3 months prior to my NARSUM submissions. Therefore, it is clear that im not broken because i wasnt broken when i was better...
Why is it people that want to get out, get to stay in and others who want to stay in, the military pushes out? I would love to have my findings be fit for duty, I keep telling the doctors I can do my job fine, have abs no symptoms...but they all recommend the opposite.
they found me fit solely on evals also. did you request a rebuttal if so how did it work out for you
I was found fit because of Evals as well. Waiting my appeal to Navy CORB that the peb was wrong for denying fpeb hearing request.
@SirEnder I have been out 345+ days since 2015 for mental health, irritable bowel for appointments not including out of work for bathroom emergencies. With impatient and outpatient stays. I was even said in my NMA to be a working patient out 3-4 days a week for over a year. Found fit all the way through and denied a formal hearing. Still appealing it though. They said it was evals for being fit and a ucmj for why I was out of work. The ucmj was in 2017.
Oh hey its me. Daniel. I just signed up to this website because I was curious. I saw a few others having the same issue I am with the PEB denying others and finding them fit due to evaluations.
NVLSP provides free IDES representation to service members, including those found FIT for duty. If interested apply at info@nvlsp.org.
I am lucky that your service accepted me. I appreciate the help and support of your organization. I hope in time to be able to find ways to give back.
I’m curious out of the bunch above with fit findings m, what were the following NMA markings?
Is mbr working outside of his specialty?
If yes, can the mbr continue service in rate?
Is the mbr deplorable or worldwide assignable?
If not recommended for PLD, explain why mbr can’t?
Any phrases, or CO remarks that may have been used to make it sound like you can perform at work or hints at retainability etc?
Is mbr working outside of his specialty?
If yes, can the mbr continue service in rate?
Is the mbr deplorable or worldwide assignable?
If not recommended for PLD, explain why mbr can’t?
Any phrases, or CO remarks that may have been used to make it sound like you can perform at work or hints at retainability etc?
Probably was my NMA sounded convoluted. I am hoping my evaluation that I got and sent with my appeal to the DIRNCORB which shows I am out of work because of medical and has nothing to do with my UCMJ. My NMA tied together my clearance loss with my UCMJ when in fact it was for behavior health only.
My NMA.
Is mbr working outside of his specialty?
Yes, working on general duties. Working Patient out of work 30 hours a week.
If yes, can the mbr continue service in rate?
No
Is the mbr deplorable or worldwide assignable?
No
If not recommended for PLD, explain why mbr can’t?
No, No comments listed for this section
Any phrases, or CO remarks that may have been used to make it sound like you can perform at work or hints at retainability etc?
- Attaching an image for this.
- Since this write up I have been advised I will no be receiving my clearance back while receiving behavior health treatment for my conditions which is indefinitely and my most recent note from my psychiatrist confirms that I should not work with classified information. The new eval stating I am out of work for medical and not retain-able for this reason, my psychiatrist note and a note indicated my clearance will not be returned has been provided in my current pending appeal.
Sorry I meant
Is the mbr *deployable* or worldwide assignable?
The only thing I noticed, that could potentially push a fit decision in the CO remarks are "Specifically, not having classified material/facility access prevents him from conducting his assign mission. *Should his clearance be revoked, he would likely be required to cross-rate*
Maybe that contradicted the first few questions on pg 1 of the NMA? I'm no expert at this by any means, so please don't take my word with much weight but, possibly this had an impact on the decision?
Is mbr working outside of his specialty?
Yes, working on general duties. Working Patient out of work 30 hours a week.
If yes, can the mbr continue service in rate?
No
Hoping it's not the evals, because I may run into similar issues having a 'P' and 'MP' evals, MP being most recent because it was a transfer eval....
Is the mbr *deployable* or worldwide assignable?
The only thing I noticed, that could potentially push a fit decision in the CO remarks are "Specifically, not having classified material/facility access prevents him from conducting his assign mission. *Should his clearance be revoked, he would likely be required to cross-rate*
Maybe that contradicted the first few questions on pg 1 of the NMA? I'm no expert at this by any means, so please don't take my word with much weight but, possibly this had an impact on the decision?
Is mbr working outside of his specialty?
Yes, working on general duties. Working Patient out of work 30 hours a week.
If yes, can the mbr continue service in rate?
No
Hoping it's not the evals, because I may run into similar issues having a 'P' and 'MP' evals, MP being most recent because it was a transfer eval....
Your NMA did not help your case.
Your findings would have came back unfit if your CO remark was member is currently unable to perform is primary duties due to his medical condition(s). I don't think the UCMJ, Clearance issue and some of the other comment was necessary.